Qualified in 2006
Keith Webster is a specialist employment barrister based in London, where he practices across the full spectrum of employment and discrimination law. He is recognised for offering clear, commercial, and practical advice, combined with robust advocacy skills developed through extensive tribunal and civil litigation experience. Keith’s earlier career as a senior business executive gives him valuable insight into workplace dynamics and commercial decision‑making.
Keith regularly appears before Employment Tribunals and provides strategic guidance throughout all stages of employment disputes. He is appreciated for his calm and methodical case preparation, forensic cross‑examination, and ability to explain legal options, risks, and likely outcomes clearly to clients. His advisory work includes drafting employment contracts and policies, and guiding employers through complex disciplinary and grievance procedures.
Keith’s employment law expertise includes advising and representing both employers and employees in:
Clients and solicitors value Keith for his:
Notable Cases
C v Z - Restricted Reporting & Anonymisation Orders. Represented the Respondent in a case heard over 20 days and relating to Claims of direct discrimination, harassment, and victimisation. The panel made findings in favour of the respondent on all 49 issues relating to the substantive claims.
Tolley v Birmingham City Council 2003. Secured judgment in favour of the Claimant in relation to Unfair Dismissal and Suffering Detriments due to Whistleblowing.
X v Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospital Restricted (Reporting & Anonymisation Orders). Obtained an Order for Strike Out on day 2 of a 20-day trial.
A v H Disability Discrimination [Dyslexia and ADHD], Unfair Dismissal. For the CEO of a charity.
J v A Unfair Dismissal, Detriment due to whistleblowing, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deductions from wages. For the CEO of an international, venture -capital backed, company after his dismissal following allegations of misleading shareholders.
Phillips v Madine, For the Respondent in the ‘My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding’ Unfair Dismissal Case. Instructions in relation to remedy only. Minimised remedy ordered to less than 10% of the schedule of loss after a long forensic cross examination of the Claimant in respect of her business finances which followed complex applications for specific disclosure of financial records.
D v A -Complex claim for suffering detriments due to whistleblowing claim involving allegations of corrupt tendering practices in international energy contracts. Represented the Claimant. Settled by Mediation.
Office Equipment Systems Ltd v Hughes [2018] EWCA Civ 1842 - Court of Appeal - against a first instance decision upheld by the EAT debarring a Respondent from making submissions on remedy following a default judgment in a complex and high value unfair dismissal claim. Led by David Reade KC.
Education
MBA, Warwick
GDL, College of Law
LLM (Employment Law), Surrey
Gray´s Inn – Bacon Award 2006
Appointments
Gray´s Inn - Ethics Trainer
For more information on Direct Access, Employment Law and working with our team visit our blog.